All checks were successful
ci / build-test (push) Successful in 4m12s
Per Hendrik's direction, no nJAMS references on the website. The
founder pedigree claim now stands on the years and the customer
segment ("15 years building integration monitoring for banks,
insurers, and logistics operators") without naming a prior product.
Changes:
- src/components/sections/SocialProofStrip.astro: drop the
' · ex-nJAMS' suffix from the founder attribution; collapse the
multi-step PENDING comment into a single-line founder-name TODO.
- src/components/sections/WhyUs.astro: drop the trademark-review
comment (no longer relevant — the body text never named the
prior product, only the comment did).
- OPERATOR-CHECKLIST.md: remove the 'Why us / nJAMS wording review'
pre-publish task. Also rename the adjacent 'MID-tier retention'
TODO to 'Starter-tier retention' to match the relaunched tier
taxonomy.
- docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-25-cameleer-website-relaunch-design.md:
update §4, §6.2, §12 to reflect the removed wording. Only the
founder-name placeholder remains as a pre-publish blocker.
Historical specs / plans under docs/superpowers/{specs,plans}/
keep their original wording — they're records of past decisions
and are not on the website.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
33 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
33 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
---
|
|
<section class="border-b border-border">
|
|
<div class="max-w-content mx-auto px-6 py-20 md:py-24">
|
|
<div class="max-w-2xl mb-16">
|
|
<p class="text-accent font-mono text-xs tracking-[0.25em] uppercase mb-4">Why Cameleer</p>
|
|
<h2 class="text-hero font-bold text-text mb-4">
|
|
A purpose-built tool, from the team that has built integration observability before.
|
|
</h2>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="grid md:grid-cols-2 gap-8 md:gap-12">
|
|
<div class="rounded-lg border border-border bg-bg-elevated p-8 transition-all duration-200 ease-out hover:-translate-y-0.5 hover:border-accent/40 hover:shadow-[0_12px_32px_-12px_rgba(240,180,41,0.18)]">
|
|
<h3 class="text-xl font-bold text-text mb-4">Generic APMs do not understand Camel. Cameleer does.</h3>
|
|
<p class="text-text-muted leading-relaxed mb-4">
|
|
Most monitoring tools see your app as a Java process and a pile of HTTP calls. Cameleer understands that you are running a Camel app — choices, splits, multicasts, error handlers, and every other EIP pattern as first-class citizens.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p class="text-text-muted leading-relaxed">
|
|
So when you ask "why did this exchange fail?", you get an answer, not a log tail. And you can reach back into a running app to replay a message, deep-trace a correlation ID, or toggle recording — observability that does things, not just shows them.
|
|
</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div class="rounded-lg border border-border bg-bg-elevated p-8 transition-all duration-200 ease-out hover:-translate-y-0.5 hover:border-accent/40 hover:shadow-[0_12px_32px_-12px_rgba(240,180,41,0.18)]">
|
|
<h3 class="text-xl font-bold text-text mb-4">Built by people who've operated integration in production for 15 years.</h3>
|
|
<p class="text-text-muted leading-relaxed mb-4">
|
|
We spent over a decade building integration monitoring for banks, insurers, and logistics operators — the kind of shops where a stuck exchange is a regulatory event, not just an inconvenience.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p class="text-text-muted leading-relaxed">
|
|
Cameleer is what we'd build today, purpose-built for Apache Camel. No legacy, no retrofit, no assumptions about a generic middleware platform.
|
|
</p>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</section>
|